oh... I guess when i proposed the idea, i had always considered a majority vote as a two thirds Majority...
After some searching, see that a two thirds vote is a SuperMajority or a Consensus...
I also see quotes like this
"I'm fond of the supermajority idea--a major decision that can't muster 2/3 member support is probably a bad idea. It should also lead to more interplay between the various groups--more conversation and more compromise."
"I am not sure what would be the most effective, but my best guess is a two-thirds (66.6%) majority. The main reason for this is that it might prevent the organization from becoming divided into two factions"
Idk... You decide...

In the whole chart, it only changes 1 or 2 numbers by 1...
I just think it would be better to need more votes...